TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between Discrepancy Index and the Objective Grading System in Thai board of orthodontics Patients
AU - Viwattanatipa, Nita
AU - Buapuean, Weerawat
AU - Komoltri, Chulaluk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd and The Japanese Orthodontic Society
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Objective Using the American Board of Orthodontics system (ABO), this study determined whether there was any relationship between the Discrepancy Index (DI) and Objective Grading System (OGS) scores. Second objective was to determine the correlation between the objective scores by ABO system and subjective scores judged by candidates. Materials and methods 200 records from 25 candidates for Thai board of orthodontics were evaluated using (1) DI and (2) OGS. Candidates were asked to evaluate their own cases on 2 parameters: (1) difficulty level and (2) Satisfaction visual analog scale (VAS). Spearman correlation coefficients were computed to assess the relationship among these 4 variables. In addition, 3 subgroups of DI scores (low, medium, high) were tested if there were any association with 3 subgroups of OGS (passing, undetermined, failing), using Chi-square test. Results Mean DI was 23.48 (SD 15.39), OGS was 26.39 (SD 9.77), Satisfaction VAS was 62.81 (SD 8.04) and median of difficulty level was 2.15. There were no correlation between DI and OGS, OGS and Satisfaction VAS, DI and Satisfaction VAS. However, difficulty level was, at low level, significantly correlated with DI and Satisfaction VAS (p-value <.05). Percentage distribution of DI; low was 10%, medium was 42% and high was 48.0%, and of OGS; passing 26%, undetermined 45% and failing 29%. There were no association among 3 subgroups of DI with 3 subgroups of OGS. Conclusions DI could not be used as a weighted factor for OGS in determining if the case would pass or fail in ThBO cases.
AB - Objective Using the American Board of Orthodontics system (ABO), this study determined whether there was any relationship between the Discrepancy Index (DI) and Objective Grading System (OGS) scores. Second objective was to determine the correlation between the objective scores by ABO system and subjective scores judged by candidates. Materials and methods 200 records from 25 candidates for Thai board of orthodontics were evaluated using (1) DI and (2) OGS. Candidates were asked to evaluate their own cases on 2 parameters: (1) difficulty level and (2) Satisfaction visual analog scale (VAS). Spearman correlation coefficients were computed to assess the relationship among these 4 variables. In addition, 3 subgroups of DI scores (low, medium, high) were tested if there were any association with 3 subgroups of OGS (passing, undetermined, failing), using Chi-square test. Results Mean DI was 23.48 (SD 15.39), OGS was 26.39 (SD 9.77), Satisfaction VAS was 62.81 (SD 8.04) and median of difficulty level was 2.15. There were no correlation between DI and OGS, OGS and Satisfaction VAS, DI and Satisfaction VAS. However, difficulty level was, at low level, significantly correlated with DI and Satisfaction VAS (p-value <.05). Percentage distribution of DI; low was 10%, medium was 42% and high was 48.0%, and of OGS; passing 26%, undetermined 45% and failing 29%. There were no association among 3 subgroups of DI with 3 subgroups of OGS. Conclusions DI could not be used as a weighted factor for OGS in determining if the case would pass or fail in ThBO cases.
KW - American Board of Orthodontics
KW - Discrepancy Index
KW - Malocclusion
KW - Objective Grading System
KW - Outcome assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991051812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.odw.2016.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.odw.2016.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991051812
SN - 1344-0241
VL - 75
SP - 54
EP - 63
JO - Orthodontic Waves
JF - Orthodontic Waves
IS - 3
ER -