TY - JOUR
T1 - The accuracy of virtual setup in simulating treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Sereewisai, Benja
AU - Chintavalakorn, Rochaya
AU - Santiwong, Peerapong
AU - Nakornnoi, Theerasak
AU - Neoh, Siew Peng
AU - Sipiyaruk, Kawin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, British Dental Association.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of virtual orthodontic setup in simulating treatment outcomes and to determine whether virtual setup should be used in orthodontic practice and education. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to November 2022 to identify all potentially relevant evidence. The reference lists of identified articles were also screened for relevant literature. The last search was conducted on 30 November 2022. Results: This systematic review included twenty-one articles, where all of them were assessed as moderate risk of bias. The extracted data were categorized into three groups, which were: (1) Virtual setup and manual setup; (2) Virtual setup and actual outcomes in clear aligner treatment; (3) Virtual setup and actual outcomes in fixed appliance treatment. There appeared to be statistically significant differences between virtual setups and actual treatment outcomes, however the discrepancies were clinically acceptable. Conclusion: This systematic review supports the use of orthodontic virtual setups, and therefore they should be implemented in orthodontic practice and education with clinically acceptable accuracy. However, high-quality research should be required to confirm the accuracy of virtual setups in simulating treatment outcomes.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of virtual orthodontic setup in simulating treatment outcomes and to determine whether virtual setup should be used in orthodontic practice and education. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to November 2022 to identify all potentially relevant evidence. The reference lists of identified articles were also screened for relevant literature. The last search was conducted on 30 November 2022. Results: This systematic review included twenty-one articles, where all of them were assessed as moderate risk of bias. The extracted data were categorized into three groups, which were: (1) Virtual setup and manual setup; (2) Virtual setup and actual outcomes in clear aligner treatment; (3) Virtual setup and actual outcomes in fixed appliance treatment. There appeared to be statistically significant differences between virtual setups and actual treatment outcomes, however the discrepancies were clinically acceptable. Conclusion: This systematic review supports the use of orthodontic virtual setups, and therefore they should be implemented in orthodontic practice and education with clinically acceptable accuracy. However, high-quality research should be required to confirm the accuracy of virtual setups in simulating treatment outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168923310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41405-023-00167-3
DO - 10.1038/s41405-023-00167-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168923310
SN - 2056-807X
VL - 9
JO - BDJ Open
JF - BDJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - 41
ER -